| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Still only a type definition.
Typed Lua is no longer maintained.
Teal is currently an active project.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
XEP-0004: Partial forms are handled
XEP-0045: We're already strict with GC 1.0
XEP-0060: Change in semantics wrt 'pubsub#type', but not in code
XEP-0115: No protocol change
XEP-0138: Specification moved to Obsolete
XEP-0163: Editorial only change
XEP-0215: Minor schema change
XEP-0280: Editorial change
XEP-0297: Had the wrong version number
XEP-0106: Note missing piece for version 1.1
XEP-0313: Editorial change
XEP-0363: Editorial clarification, no code change required
XEP-0380: Registry additions, no code change needed
XEP-0384: Not directly supported, only here because people will ask otherwise
XEP-0445: Broken out of XEP-0401
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See https://www.ietf.org/blog/finalizing-ietf-tools-transition/
Already done in various other places.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
This 'config' argument was removed without explanation in d8dbf569766c
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
This field can be viewed using s2s:show(nil, "... starttls") even
without any special support in mod_admin_shell, which can be added later
to make it nicer. One can then assume that a TLS connection with an
empty / nil starttls field means Direct TLS.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
This makes explicit which lookups can accept an unsigned response.
Insecure (unsigned, as before DNSSEC) A and AAAA records can be used as
security would come from TLS, but an insecure TLSA record is worthless.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The last missing piece of #1760, otherwise SCRAM-SHA-*-PLUS is not
actually advertised.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Brings back SCRAM-SHA-*-PLUS from its hiatus brought on by the earlier
channel binding method being undefined for TLS 1.3, and the increasing
deployment of TLS 1.3.
See 1bfd238e05ad and #1542
Requires future version of LuaSec, once support for this key material
export method is merged.
See https://github.com/brunoos/luasec/pull/187
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Probably a duplicate of the comment next to Lmove, recorded by mistake
Lpack can probably be removed at some point in the near future once we
are confident it is not used anywhere.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Added in d278a770eddc avoid having to deal with its absence in Lua 5.1.
No longer needed when Lua 5.1 support is dropped.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Requires luacheck 0.25.0
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Prevents attempting to load libraries that may no longer be found and
crashing with a traceback.
Platforms like Debian where multiple Lua versions can be installed at
the same time and 'lua' pointing to one of the installed interpreters
via symlinks, there's the possibility that prosody/prosodyctl may be
invoked with Lua 5.1, which will no longer have any of the rest of
Prosody libraries available to be require(), and thus would immediately
fail with an unfriendly traceback.
Checking and aborting early with a friendlier message and reference to
more information is better.
Part of #1600
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Part of #1600
Is this module even needed anymore?
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Part of #1600
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Part of #1600
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Part of #1600
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Part of #1600
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reverts some of 1e41dd0f8353
Seems HMAC() isn't deprecated after all? Must have been at some point
according to #1589
Twice as fast for some reason.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unused since 9f1c5ae8d70b
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
With luck, might contain more details than just "failed"
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For completeness and consistency with set of plain hash functions
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
HMAC() is deprecated
As with the regular hash functions, macros like this make it awkward to
apply static analysis and code formatting.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MD5() is deprecated, but EVP_md5() is not.
Functions in macros like this make it awkward to apply static analysis
and code formatting.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
This was slightly inaccurate since 6e1af07921d1 because the conditions
are more complicated now.
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Because interesting, gives some idea about the efficiency.
|