| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This allows clients that try to resume a session after a server restart
to at least know which of their pending outgoing stanzas were received
and which need to be re-sent.
This removes the limit on how many of those counters are kept, which
should be fixed eventually.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since nothing uses it. Some equivalent functionality may return in the
future.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I have no idea what is going on in this code, which session is which?
Something has one of the sessions as an upvalue which is where the
filter checks for it.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Encountered what looks like a bug where after *many* resumptions, part
of the queue was not acked.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Maybe it works now with the session patching in the previous commit
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The number of places where the session is an upvalue to its own methods
is too high!
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As per a86ae74da96c the 'session' object here is the wrong session, so
the attempt to block stanzas from being added to the queue twice did not
work causing something of a leak.
Instead we have a leak of the previous session.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The attempted fix completely broke everything after resumption.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
a86ae74da96c caused the stanza queue to double on resumption because
session.send() keeps a reference to the session which is what gets
passed to filters, so the added flag was not seen in the filter.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
To aid in debugging
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This should rule out error replies to PEP notifications, which come from
the account bare JID, and would be reflected back to it if they can't be
delivered for some reason, e.g. s2s problems.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Including the payload of the stanza that caused the error is optional
and we're generally not doing it anywhere else.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Mistake introduced in cbe524ed1a6a. Removing because this is a query to
the bare JID where the error origin matches the resulting stanza 'from'.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The numeric error codes seems to have been removed from the examples in
XEP-0045 version 1.24, and were deprecated even by RFC 3920 in 2004,
only allowed for backwards compatibility.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
I spend several minutes confused over where the bug was until I
remembered I had set myself as visitor in the previous debug session.
This would have helped.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Allows inferring whether Direct TLS was used, or perhaps which SRV
record was chosen. Not shown by default.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It was previously set to the hostname, not the users bare JID which
would be correct.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This allows overriding it in cases where it is not equal to module.host,
like say, in mod_pep
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Is it not odd that um.set_roles() takes `nil` to mean global?
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If you already know the account, from say the server contact info, then
this confirms their admin status.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Can these even be seen?
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Needed to e.g. grant admin rights on a component, or grant non-local
users local privileges.
Leave the same host syntax for convenience, since this might be the
common case.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This would allow e.g. granting admin status without changing the config
and without a restart.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This makes it easier to reschedule or otherwise manipulate the timer
from e.g. the shell, which is handy for debugging.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It was lost in 6f4790b8deec when switching to mod_cron.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Prefer 'prune' over 'delete' since it more strongly implies removal of
excess.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Before aa60f4353001 each loop had its own counter, seems incrementing of
one of them was lost. But only one is needed anyhow.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Before mod_cron this job ran less frequently than the upload removal
job. Running them at the same frequency seems wasteful somehow, plus the
total should not drift away from the true value that fast.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Makes it more generic so new periods (e.g. weekly etc) can be added
easily.
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The value needs to be known in order to determine if additional uploads
can be accepted.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Passing nil to the metrics system causes errors later.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since reply.attr.to will be the .attr.from of the input we can check
this earlier and avoid constructing the reply at all.
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Did error_reply() not exist when mod_smacks was first created?
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Eventually the goal is to have daily tasks run while there is little
activity, but that will vary with the server and the usage patterns of
its users. This is a start anyway.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Merging those loops removes the miscounting that would occur in case a
file could not be deleted, so no need to limit it to that case.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Not sure what the benefit of two separate loops was, perhaps reduced
memory usage by allowing archive query state to be garbage collected
before moving on to deleting files. Never measured so probably not so.
This simplifies a bit.
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This is probably a bad idea, as files that could not be deleted for some
reason will not be tried again. I was just thinking of what the 'task'
argument could be used for.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|