From a0dbd1fc24bb34964d715cf3addcdab8b1de90c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kim Alvefur Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 22:55:49 +0100 Subject: util.prosodyctl.check: Use same wording about 'daemonize' and 'no_daemonize' Why would they use different wording? --- util/prosodyctl/check.lua | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'util/prosodyctl') diff --git a/util/prosodyctl/check.lua b/util/prosodyctl/check.lua index 1fdf6cbf..7c911876 100644 --- a/util/prosodyctl/check.lua +++ b/util/prosodyctl/check.lua @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ local function check(arg) anonymous_login = "use 'authentication = \"anonymous\"'", daemonize = "use the --daemonize/-D or --foreground/-F command line flags", disallow_s2s = "add \"s2s\" to 'modules_disabled'", - no_daemonize = "use the --daemonize/-D or --foreground/-F flags", + no_daemonize = "use the --daemonize/-D or --foreground/-F command line flags", require_encryption = "use 'c2s_require_encryption' and 's2s_require_encryption'", vcard_compatibility = "use 'mod_compat_vcard' from prosody-modules", use_libevent = "use 'network_backend = \"event\"'", -- cgit v1.2.3